PEER REVIEW

Manuscripts submitted for publication at ADJURIS – International Academic Publisher undergo a double-blind peer review process, adhering to international standards for scientific books. Thus, any manuscript submitted for publication will be reviewed by at least two reviewers of national and international repute in the social sciences. The review is conducted anonymously (the author’s name is not disclosed to the reviewers, and the reviewers’ names are not disclosed to the author). If necessary, authors will receive recommendations and observations aimed at improving the quality of their paper’s content. Reviewers may also recommend rejecting the manuscript for publication.

In conducting the evaluation, reviewers adhere to the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers, as published by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Based on their evaluation, reviewers may recommend:

• publication of the manuscript as submitted;
• publication of the manuscript subject to amendments in accordance with the observations made in the Evaluation Form;
• rejection of the manuscript.

Manuscript evaluation is carried out by members of the Editorial Advisory Boards in collaboration with external reviewers, using the Evaluation form for the books and Evaluation form for the conference proceedings.

The rights and responsibilities of reviewers are detailed in the Ethics and Malpractice Statement for ADJURIS – International Academic Publisher.

ADJURIS – International Academic Publisher encourages the publication of manuscripts with international relevance that present comparative research, promote interdisciplinarity within the social sciences, integrate theoretical and empirical analysis through case studies, and are supported by a solid bibliographic foundation.

Those interested in acquiring the esteemed role of scientific reviewer are invited to complete the Registration form for to acquire the quality of scientific reviewer of the ADJURIS – International Academic Publisher.